You have to play NZ local time 6pm-9pm to get the best pick of team mates Kiwi I have played with you a few times previously and you're not too shabby, Doubtless, they are skilled - probably not as skilled as their stats are indicating in that one ship, but they probably know their way around World of Warships. Combined with the small sample size above and BAM. Populate your side with one or two extra competent players and this has a tremendous influence on your chances of winning. Bringing division mates erases one of the biggest RNG-based winrate modifiers, namely being on the better team. So yes, a 93.33% win rate over 30 games is commendable but it's probably not an accurate indication of their true proficiency. Small Sample Sizes - While it's not easy to achieve a high win rate over 30 games, it's a Hell of a lot easier than doing the same over a more meaningful sample of 100, 200 or 500 games.
It's pretty simple it largely boils down to three things. I know this may spark a series of git-gud comments, but it is a simple question that a number of average players struggle with. You sometimes just get a run of those battles and that is the luck of RNG player selection. Often it does not matter how well you play and even though you may end in the top 3, the team still loses. I have to say I class myself as a recreation player with over 8000 battles and struggle to reach 49%. That same player has many other ships win win rates in excess of 80% over many battles. Can someone please explain to me how this is possible when you are randomly placed in teams and the law of averages tells you that there is at least a 50% chance you will be in a team that may lose. I am curious as to how some players manage such high win rates in excess of 65%.Īs an example I just came across a player who had a win rate of 93.33% over 30 battles in a Puerto Rico.
0 kommentar(er)
